Linchpin: Are You Indispensable? Part III

(I) The Race To The Bottom (continued)

When Walmart enters a rural market, businesses close, jobs disappear, and the town declines, according Godin. This is acceptable because Walmart has low prices for every possible item. Macroecomonic theory is irrelevant to people making a million tiny microeconomic decisions every day in a hypercompetitive world. Those decisions repeatedly favour fast/cheap over slow/expensive. Godin accepts that we cannot halt capitalism through the freezing of prices, and industries, so we need to think differently in order to produce a viable solution for the race to the bottom.

Critique of the Race To The Bottom: If you think, as Godin does, like a marketer, then yes, it might appear to be true that the service industry is collapsing but it is instead becoming more specialized, and developing in unanticipated ways. He should be arguing that increased departmentalization needs to be bridged through better on the job training. Human capital is falling for those who do not invest in teaching themselves how to be productive. Self-taught people generate more value. Godin believes that factories in the service industry have collapsed, he is not entirely correct, as new industries have been born.

(This is a series of posts on Seth Godin’s Linchpin: Are You Indispensable?)

Margaret Thatcher on the Generals, Commissars & Mandarins

On the Generals, Commissars & Mandarins
Thatcher disagrees with the view that peace is more certain with the slowing of progress on defensive technology. History has repeatedly demonstrated that deterrents are better means to that end. The atom bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki for example. Aggressors do not start wars because their adversary has built up his own strength they start wars because they believe they can gain more by going to war than by remaining at peace. This is the fundamental defence analysis that Thatcher espouses. Regarding NATO, it is essential that the USSR fails in their attempt to drive a wedge between the US and its European partners (Britain most importantly). NATO must be united against the USSR in order to be effective against possible invasion from the East. NATO was no military threat for the USSR only a philosophical threat of freedom and justice. The Soviets were pressing to gain military advantage. Effective internationalism must be built on only strong nations. Global citizenry weakens the will of individuals to fight for their country. Agrees ion must always be firmly resisted.

On the Trident Purchase
Britain needed to retain its deterrent against USSR. The American Trident missiles served this purpose. The Trident deal did not allow Thatcher to turn the key (no duel key). She justifies this by stating that the cost of owning the missiles was too high and that the US would be best prepared in the event of nuclear attack to coordinate retaliation. Thatcher used her relationship with Reagan to secure a reasonable and equal deal for the Trident II missiles necessary for UK defence.