Showdown: Iraq, this is pretty interesting…..a very effective walk through documentary. You can read my detailed analysis from undergrad here: the History of the Ba’ath Party.
Showdown: Iraq, this is pretty interesting…..a very effective walk through documentary. You can read my detailed analysis from undergrad here: the History of the Ba’ath Party.
Challenges of finding a Pure Play: it’s not easy to find a firm that is exactly like the other firms you are comparing. Loblaws & Metro: Outlets like No Frill (Loblaws). But what is days o inventory different at Metro: their days of inventory is shorter.
Product Mix is different for Loblaws than Metro.
Risk and Profitability Analysis
Principles of Ratio Analysis
Measures of Short-Term Risk
Working Capital = Current Assets minus Current Liabilities.
Positive working capital: CA – CL > 0 is the ideal.


Prepaid expenses = the rent. Which firm might have a current and quit ratio that differ dramatically?

Indicated how fast firms sell merchandise. If inventory turn over twice a year, then they average one-half of a year in inventory (and a days inventory of 182.5). Why do we typically want a higher inventory turnover?
For what sort of firm might a higher days inventory be preferred.
Raw Materials
RW Work in Progress
|_____________|________________________________|______________________| Finished Goods
Picked Grape Juice
CA/CL (4) C+ A/R+M/S < .19
CL highly illiquid assets
You don’t sell in a pinch, not very liquid. You might have some short-term obligations to the bank.

Average Accounts Receivable
Measures how quickly a firm collects cash. If A/R turns over twice a year, then days accounts receivable is 182.5 or on average one-half of a year to collect receivables. High turnover and fewer days to collect A/R is generally preferred.
For what sort of firms might it be normal to have higher days accounts receivable:
If you are extending credit: you would need a line of credit if your suppliers have no extension of credit.
In 2011, Apple $108 Billion in sales
(Average Accounts Receivable/Sales) x 365

5.36B + 5.5B =
2
108 billion x 365 = 18.38. Apple has perfect just in time inventory

Payables turnover = Purchases / Accounts Payable.
Where purchases = COGS + Change in Inventory
In general
Days Inventory + Days Receivable – Days Payable
Days Inventory + Days
|____________________|___________________|
Days Inventory + Days Receivable
|____________________|___________________|
35 Days 45 Days

Dell has a negative cash cycle. Dell always have cash and don’t need financing. General contractors get paid by customers and then collect interest. If this is negative, this mean you do not have external financing opportunities.
Shipping from France means you will need a line of credit. Example Rug Canada Inc. Bug in a Rug toys.
Days Inventory + Days Receivable – Days Payable
Days Inventory + Days Receivable
|____________________|___________________|
Days Payable
60 Days
You need a line of credit because you are shipping from France. And you have to make payments to France BEFORE you even get paid from customers.

Only include tangible assets (no goodwill).
Fixed Asset Turnover = Sales
Average Fixed Assets
For what type of company might a high fixed asset turnover ratio simply be a function of the industry the firm is in, as opposed to efficient use of capital assets on management’s part?

Average total assets
1.) its accounts receivable turnover, inventory turnover, and fixed asset turnover have increased.
2.) The beginning and ending balance for all assets in year 1 were the same.
3.) Sales and COGS were the same in year 1 and year 2,
Year 1 Year 2
Sales = Sales
COGS = COGS
Sales Sales
A/R > A/R (down)
What must be true.
COGS COGS
INV < INV (down)
Sales Sales
FA < FA (down)
What are some possible explanations as to why total asset turnover decreased year-over-year?
Has the firm:
You will need to do this with your group projects. No more debt lead to higher interest
Should firms with volatile operating profitability finance their operations with debt as opposed to equity? A.) Yes B.) No
No, more debt leads to higher interest
Given the points above, which firm should be most likely to finance with debt as opposed to equity?

Total Equities
Manchester United: net income $137million
$160 million why?
It look like a massive interest expense.
Revenue
Cost
Op II 160
Interest -279
Net Income -137
Ronaldo was sold. Measures of Long-Term Risk

Which of the following transactions or outcomes do not ultimately increase the D/E ratio?
Imagine a firm has a strict debt convenant that forbids the D/E ratio from going above a certain point. How would this effect the transactions listed in A – E?
Debt convents shift to existing debt holders.

ROA = Net Income x Sales
Sales Assets
ROA tells us something about the firm’s operating strategy.
Profit margin ratio = Net Income
Sales
Total assets turnover = Sales
Average total assets.
ROA = NI/Sales x Sales/Assets
The leverage ratio tells us something about the firm’s financing strategy
ROE = L (Up) + E
E
Example HOME
H EQ ROA ROE
1M 1M 1.1M 100k/1m = 10%
1M 0 1.1M 100k/1m = 10%
900K -10% -10%
1M infinity – 0%
ROE
ROA is negative amplified it to negative infinity.
ROE > ROA

ROE can be disaggregated into 3 ratios:
ROE = profit margin X total asset turnover X Leverage Ratio
ROE = ROA X leverage ratio
The leverage ratio tells us something about the firm’s financing strategy
As a firm’s debt increases, what happens to its ROE?
A.) it increases
B.) it decreases
C.) it depends
Reading the Walmart Patent, it seems like this is something that can and should be contested. The diagrams a literally what bees do + bluetooth and UAV prior art. What is the patent really? Seems unfair and worth attacking as a legal expert should (I am not one by the way).
Can you patent a docking station? Not sure. We know that China has a problem as the bubble bee population is in a state of collapse. Full grown adult Chinese citizens are pollinating flowers manually……so drone bees is a market.
This is the HoneyDrone (trademark) 
(November 8, 1927 – March 28, 2018) Hungarian-Canadian Peter Munk moved to Canada 1941. He was of Jewish decent and Studied Engineering in the 1950s at UofT. There were no women in engineering in the 1950s….Peter Munk was interested a radio technology and his uncle was in that space. He was interested in radio tubes; with $3000 dollars he establish Clairtone: it was a Canadian success company. Largely, due to innovating in the cooling of the cathode tubes needed to project images on the TV. It was the BlackBerry (another Canadian startup) of the late 1950s – 1960s. Canada was mostly resources, so people didn’t believe that something that sold at $500 from Canada(?) could be sold at Bloomingdales.
The Canadian government was very interested in protecting industry and Clairtone became a natural darling of Canadian federal governments and consumers generally. The company scaled across the Canadian market. Most Canadians will remember the Clairtone product line. It was the first company to use transistors in the television.
It was a Canadian Watch this commercial from over 50 years ago. “Smart people won’t settle for something new.”
The Clairtone company transitioned to Nova Scotia thanks to incredible government grants. Munk wanted to help Nova Scotia’s shipping industry. Premier Stanfield successfully attracted Peter Munk’s business into moving to New Glasgow in Nova Scotia. Why? Job creation + the Nova Scotia shipping industry skill set could be transferred to technology. However there were bond payment defaults, workers in Nova Scotia went on strike. As a result, the Government of Nova Scotia bought the TV company in 1970. Peter Munk walked away with a lot of capital.
Munk built a television set prototype with transistors rather than vacuum tubes in hi sbasement. Munk thought that too much knowledge can be dangerous: he was driven to be number one. He didn’t know transistors because he hadn’t taken that class yet. Peter Munk had to re-invent himself but reallocating his capital into hotels. Created South Pacific Hotel organization in Fiji etc. Munk sold that and then started in Natural Oil in 1979, he lost a lot of money and had a good board. So he pivoted to mining. Munk worked with Joseph Rotman and had a few lucky breaks. He founded Barrick Mining company. Barrick Gold is now the largest gold mining company. They bought CanFlo: they had diversified by they moved to coal, oil, therma all of that collapsed; the Bank wanted Munk to rescue the company and then merge CanFlo with Barrick. They had amazing management miners; outstanding in geotechnology, metallurgy.
Acquisitions: Bought Texaco mining; double the production, half the overhead. Bought GoldStrike, BlackMinerals. As the stock improved they exercised their magic and into all the mines. Mining is about evening out the cycle. Barrick Gold would use it’s shares to buy companies.
Munk wonders out load: Why there are so few global leader companies from Canada. For example, a tiny country like Denmark has 6 major success stories: Phillips, Shell etc. Even BlackBerry, Nortel. Canadians are the best but we screw-up; Seagrams, the Wrightman brother owned Canary Wharf, Cadillac Fairview.
If I could provide an answer. 1) it’s easier to move to the US and test your idea in that market and then stay there, even if the standard of living etc is not as great as Canada’s. 2) tyranny of distance: doing business across a vast underpopulated country is costly, 3) government is selectively protectionist; helping certain companies who support the various political party leadership a) get re-elected, b) fundraise etc etc. The answer to getting it back is a billion dollar question.
Peter Munk is extremely patriotic of Canada. The immigrants to Canad were given security, free healthcare, etc etc. He believe that where you come from matters, but it’s where you are going too. Money is a token to recognize success, do not hand that money over to your kids, it’s better giving them education, values, and tell them how to live a life. As a result Munk believes in redistributing the funds. Money should go back to the society: Canada in Peter Munk’s case.
Money is a token of success. It is not the success itself. Money is a measure. George Soros who is also from Hungary broke the Bank of England and caused the pound to collapse. It led to John Major’s failed leadership. That is one way to make money by Munk believes these speculators are not the ones to aspire to. After you did get that money, it’s what you do with the Money. You need to look at the second side, you should not horde it. If you do the achievement part + the second part. You can’t do much better than that.