Category Archives: Science

Concorde – Going Super Sonic Against Complacent Carriers & Manufacturers

Super Sonic is the past. But if corrections are made, super sonic travel may be the future in some form or another. The truth is that a Super Sonic aircraft is able to deliver passengers more quickly but expensively. The Concorde had its problems but the airlines and the manufacturers decided to end the goal of satisfying an obvious desire amongst customers; to get where you’re going quickly and safely. I expect a new generation of high speed airliners to emerge if airlines demand that their manufacturers innovate to address with customers may want or don’t realize they want rather than towards seeking to maximize shareholder equity; a noble goal to be sure. If shareholders were in control of businesses, they would be. Leave the vision to the top brass.

Yes, Chinese Entrepreneurs are Innovative with Space Exporation On The Mind, Too #ChineseInnovations #ElonMuskIsNotSoSmart

The folks used to say Chinese people simply flout copyright laws by stealing western intellectual property, that is still partially true. However, not ALL Chinese entrepreneurs simply copy Western companies and content. Take Ruopeng Liu for example. His company is using helium to get into low levels of space which is much cheaper than Elon Musk’s reusable rocket. I think? I’m guessing here….The following is from Bloomberg:

Space Elevator | Space Lift

So taking the helium logic further, we might be able to use helium to get to space more cost effectively than SpaceX’s expensive but cool reusables. From near space, you could of course launch a space ship. Here’s how that might work just south of New York, USA: Space Elevator Proposal

You build a giant ladder that stretches out well into the Atlantic to the tune of 100 KM distance because that’s the distance between the ground and low Earth orbit. You then build a launch pad at the top with a giant helium balloon under that launch pad. And you put a space ship on the pad. DO NOT forget the space ship before you fill the balloon with helium, people šŸ˜› You might need propellers or rockets to push the helium balloon into the stratosphere. Or the space lift might have to be shorter because of the weight of the rope tether…? The purpose of the rope/tether between the launch pad and the ground is to maintain the helium required to support the space craft and launch pad and to holdĀ the ladder in place so that you could potentially send items up the rope if needed. I’m not an engineer but just thinking out loud here…and writing it down.

From the side:

space-elevator-space-lift-proposal

As you can see, the space ladder rises becoming with the world’s tallest free standing building. If you want to get it down from it’s full deployment status, you release the helium slowly. Then load another spaceship on it if you like. Alternatively you could permanently have this structure acting as a sky hook, but the issue would be how you would load another space ship on to it…You could probably have a second space elevator to meet with the first space elevator. Assuming helium is relatively cheap….

This might be what the launch pad looks likes from above:launch-pad-from-above

Anyway, worth thinking about.

Of course, this is all very phallic so you would have to make sure you include everyone, especially women in the development of the Space Lift. But basically, yeah, I can see how a flaccid tube becoming erect could be misconstrued as offensive to some…just contingency thinking here….

Going To Mars – Elon Musk’s Grande Delusion?

I was talking to someone (in the know) about the Mars mission proposed by Elon Musk. And this babyboomer said it was too dangerous; the chances of the rocket not making it to Mars with the 50 – 100 passengers is very very high. Is he right? Musk certainly gets bonus points for this viral campaign; Did sales of Tesla go up after the Mars proposal went live? I suspect so. There is no down side to dreaming big, as Trump has proven, dreaming big gets you free PR…..even if your dream is nightmarish.

No big deal….
Captive audience…

These folks are doing something interesting in this space, pun not intended. Fun question, are open systems appropriate for space exploration?Ā starburst-accelerator

What is the Difference between Second Cousins and Cousins Once Removed?

Check out these handy charts which explains the difference between “second cousins” and “cousins once removed.” I’ve always struggled with understanding if my relative William French of Calgary is actually my cousin or my uncle or my nemesis. Just kidding on the nemesis bit:-) You see, William French’s mom and my grandma are sisters. So, what is our relationship? William French and I are actually first cousins once removed….

Another useful chart:

second-cousins-and-how-we-are-related

 

how-to-understand-how-you-are-related-to-people

Remembering my father’s cousin’s kids from BC and Alberta is kind of tricky. So by referring to these handy diagrams, I can see that they are second cousins. And their kids are second cousins once removed. And their kids’ kids will be twice removed. Understand?! I’ll probably never meet THOSE kids though.

Another useful chart:
how-are-we-related

 

Diminishing Value of Labourers & Their Work

Describing the revolt of the caring classes is David Graeber’s greatest contribution; he called themĀ the “99%.” In this short video, David expands on this theme to suggest there is a quietly brewing problem in western countries; automation is displacing workers and workers have diminishing sense of meaning in their work. Graeber contends that most people have to admit that they don’t actually do ‘anything’ of substance in their “X manager role”. X equals ‘knowledge’ ‘vision’ etc.

So a lot of people actually don’t like what they do and don’t do anything of substance. David blames the ideology of work value. The paradigm for work was the factory worker. Not much has change. entrepreneurs control people who do their bidding. Work is valuable for it’s self (protestant work ethic), work is a virtue; work is supposed to suck in that sense…..If that is so, Graeber asks, what is the value of work, > 2016?